Trump-Appointed Lawyer's Indictment Dismissed Over Invalid Appointment
Trump Lawyer's Appointment Ruled Unlawful, Case Dismissed

Federal Judge Dismisses Indictment in Comey Case

A federal judge has dismissed the indictment against former FBI Director James Comey after ruling that the prosecutor leading the case was not lawfully appointed to her position. U.S. District Judge Cameron Currie, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton, made the decision after reviewing grand jury materials connected to Comey's case.

Questionable Appointment Process

Comey's legal team had argued that Lindsey Halligan was unqualified to serve as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia due to irregularities in her appointment process. The controversy stems from Halligan's sudden appointment on September 22 after the previous U.S. attorney, Trump appointee Erik Siebert, resigned from his position.

Siebert's resignation came amid reports of a pressure campaign to prosecute both Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. According to sources, Siebert had been unable to find sufficient evidence to support allegations that Comey had lied to Congress or that James had committed mortgage fraud - allegations that former President Trump had repeatedly pressured the Justice Department to investigate.

Rapid Replacement Raises Concerns

The timing of Halligan's appointment raised significant questions about the administration's motives. Just one day after Siebert resigned, Trump publicly called on Attorney General Pam Bondi to accelerate prosecutions against his political enemies. Within 24 hours of that statement, Halligan was sworn in as interim prosecutor for one of the nation's most prestigious judicial districts.

What makes this appointment particularly controversial is Halligan's complete lack of prosecutorial experience. Despite having no background in criminal prosecution, she was placed in charge of the Eastern District of Virginia, known as the "rocket docket" for its fast-paced handling of significant cases.

In addition to the appointment validity argument, Comey's lawyers are also contending that the administration's prosecution represents vindictive and selective targeting of political opponents. They argue the case should be dismissed on these grounds as well, adding another layer to the complex legal battle.

New York Attorney General Letitia James has also joined the challenge against Halligan's appointment, indicating the legal controversy extends beyond the Comey case alone. The situation continues to develop as all parties consider their next legal moves following Judge Currie's significant ruling.