Michigan Man Charged for DNA Paternity Test Impersonation Scheme
Man accused of using impersonator in DNA paternity test

Authorities in Michigan have laid charges in a bizarre case of alleged deception, where one man is accused of using another to impersonate him during a legally mandated DNA paternity test.

The Charges and Key Individuals

Mark McCracken and Derek Harrison are the two individuals facing legal consequences following the alleged scheme. The charges stem from an incident where one of the men purportedly recruited the other to take his place for a court-ordered DNA paternity test. The test was a crucial component of a legal proceeding, making the alleged impersonation a serious obstruction.

The case came to light and was reported on December 17, 2025. While specific details of the underlying paternity dispute are not fully public, the attempt to circumvent the court's order through impersonation has become the central focus of the criminal investigation.

Understanding the Legal and Ethical Breach

Court-ordered DNA tests are a standard tool in family law to establish biological parentage, which directly impacts child support, custody, and visitation rights. Submitting a fraudulent sample undermines the entire judicial process and can have severe consequences for the child and other parties involved.

The alleged actions, if proven, represent a direct attempt to defraud the court and potentially deprive a child of rightful financial and emotional support. Law enforcement treated the incident with appropriate seriousness, leading to the arrests and subsequent booking of the suspects, whose images were released by the Macomb County Jail.

Broader Implications and Next Steps

This case serves as a stark reminder of the lengths to which some individuals may go to avoid legal responsibilities. It also highlights the importance of chain-of-custody protocols and verification procedures during sample collection for forensic tests, even in seemingly straightforward cases.

Both men are now navigating the justice system as the evidence against them is presented. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how similar attempts at paternity test fraud are prosecuted moving forward, emphasizing that such deception is a prosecutable crime, not merely a civil matter.

As the legal process unfolds, the focus remains on upholding the integrity of court orders and ensuring that justice is served for all parties, especially any children affected by the original paternity dispute.