Former President Donald Trump's newly established advisory body, the Board of Peace, has begun a critical phase of its formation by convening with several invited international leaders. The primary goal of these discussions is to define the board's operational structure and its future role in global affairs.
Defining the Mandate and Mechanics
The Associated Press reported on January 19, 2026, that the board is actively engaged in high-level talks. Key figures from various nations are participating in these preliminary meetings, which are focused on answering fundamental questions about how the board will function. The discussions are tackling issues of mandate, decision-making processes, and the scope of the board's influence on international diplomacy and conflict resolution.
While the specific names of all attending leaders were not disclosed in the initial report, the involvement of multiple foreign representatives indicates an attempt to create a multinational perspective within the board's framework. The formation of this body represents a significant and unconventional development in diplomatic circles, sparking widespread curiosity about its potential impact.
A New Player in Global Diplomacy
The creation of the Board of Peace marks a notable entry of a non-governmental, yet politically powerful, entity into the sphere of international peacemaking. Analysts are watching closely to see how it will interact with existing institutions like the United Nations and traditional state-driven foreign policy channels.
The board's formation comes amid ongoing global tensions, underscoring the perceived need for new diplomatic approaches. Its success will likely depend on its ability to establish clear protocols, gain legitimacy among the international community, and define tangible objectives beyond its symbolic name.
Looking Ahead: Challenges and Expectations
The immediate challenge for the Board of Peace is to move from conceptual discussions to a concrete operational plan. Stakeholders and observers alike are awaiting details on its funding, staffing, and specific areas of focus. Will it act as a mediator, a think tank, or a direct advocacy group? These are the questions the current meetings aim to resolve.
The world will be monitoring the board's next steps, as its establishment under the guidance of a former U.S. president adds a unique and complex layer to the already intricate landscape of global conflict resolution and diplomatic engagement.
