Carney Voices Concern Over U.S. Greenland Push at Davos Forum
Carney 'concerned' about U.S. efforts to buy Greenland

Former Bank of Canada governor and international finance figure Mark Carney has publicly voiced apprehension regarding renewed and escalating efforts by the United States to purchase Greenland. Carney's comments come as he prepares to participate in the high-profile World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

Geopolitical Tensions Over Arctic Territory

Carney stated he is 'concerned' about the U.S. escalating its push to acquire Greenland, a vast, autonomous Danish territory in the Arctic. The potential purchase, which has been a topic of discussion in various U.S. administrations, carries significant geopolitical and economic implications for the Arctic region, where Canada is also a key stakeholder.

The issue highlights the increasing strategic importance of the Arctic due to climate change, which is opening new shipping routes and access to untapped natural resources. A major shift in sovereignty over Greenland could alter the balance of power and environmental management in the Far North.

Carney's Role on the Global Stage

Mark Carney's departure for the World Economic Forum, scheduled for January 19, 2026, places him at the center of global economic and political discussions. His perspective on the Greenland issue is informed by his extensive experience in central banking and his current roles in international finance and climate advocacy.

Carney's concern is not isolated. The notion of a U.S. purchase of Greenland has historically been met with skepticism and opposition from Denmark and has raised questions among Arctic nations, including Canada, about future cooperation and security in the region.

Broader Implications for Canada and the Arctic

For Canada, which shares Arctic borders and responsibilities, a change in Greenland's status would directly impact continental defense, environmental stewardship, and Indigenous partnerships. The Canadian government has long emphasized sovereignty and cooperation in the Arctic Council, where Greenland (through Denmark) is a member.

Carney's decision to highlight this issue ahead of the Davos meeting suggests it may be a topic of behind-the-scenes diplomacy among world leaders and business elites. His comments serve to bring a complex geopolitical challenge into the public forum, underscoring its potential consequences for global stability and regional dynamics.

As Carney engages with other global leaders in Switzerland, his stance is likely to reflect a cautious approach to unilateral actions that could destabilize the delicate political and environmental equilibrium in the Arctic.