B.C. Judge Criticizes Vernon, Kelowna Property Owners in Failed Airbnb Lawsuit
Judge slams B.C. owners over failed Airbnb business lawsuit

A British Columbia Supreme Court judge has issued a scathing dismissal of a lawsuit between two property owners who partnered on a failed short-term rental business, calling their venture a "recipe for disaster." The legal dispute, centered on properties in Vernon and Kelowna, was heard in court with a ruling delivered on December 24, 2025.

A Business Partnership Built on Shaky Ground

The case involved two individuals who entered into an informal agreement to operate an Airbnb business across their two properties. According to court documents, the owners of a Vernon home and a Kelowna property sued each other after their joint venture collapsed financially. The judge noted the complete absence of a formal partnership agreement or clear contract outlining roles, responsibilities, and profit-sharing.

This lack of structure led to confusion and conflict over expenses, maintenance, and revenue distribution. The court found that both parties proceeded with the business based on vague verbal understandings, which ultimately proved unworkable. Images of the two disputed properties were entered as evidence from the BC Assessment website.

Judicial Criticism and Case Dismissal

In his ruling, the judge strongly criticized the litigants for bringing their poorly conceived business dispute to court. He emphasized that the justice system is not a tool to resolve failures stemming from a complete lack of basic business planning. The lawsuit was deemed an unnecessary waste of the court's resources.

The judge dismissed all claims from both sides, refusing to assign blame or award damages for the collapse of the failed Airbnb business. The ruling underscored that entering a business relationship, especially one involving significant assets like real estate, requires more than a handshake deal. The judge stated that the owners' expectation for the court to untangle their self-created mess was unreasonable.

Lessons for the Short-Term Rental Market

This case highlights the legal perils of informal partnerships in B.C.'s booming short-term rental sector. As cities like Vernon and Kelowna continue to grapple with regulations surrounding platforms like Airbnb, this ruling serves as a stark warning to prospective operators.

The key takeaways from the B.C. Supreme Court decision are clear:

  • Formal, written agreements are non-negotiable for any joint business venture.
  • Property co-ventures must define financial contributions and management duties explicitly.
  • The courts will not rescue parties from the consequences of their own poor planning.

The decision leaves both property owners to bear their own substantial legal costs, adding financial insult to the injury of their failed business model. The case stands as a cautionary tale for real estate investors looking to capitalize on the sharing economy without doing their due diligence.