Canada's Supreme Court dismisses appeal in controversial B.C. ostrich cull case, setting precedent for animal disease management and sparking debate about farmers' rights versus public health protection.
A groundbreaking legal challenge reaches America's highest court, questioning whether U.S. passports must recognize non-binary gender identities. Discover how this case could reshape federal documentation.
A Saskatchewan murder trial witnessed a stunning admission as the defendant revealed his history of compulsive lying, calling it a 'disorder' during emotional testimony about the 2021 stabbing death.
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear a challenge to Trump-era passport policies, allowing the continued blocking of transgender and nonbinary individuals from choosing their own sex markers. This landmark decision impacts thousands seeking accurate
The future of dozens of ostriches at a controversial BC farm hangs in the balance as Canada's highest court prepares to rule on whether the birds should be culled or spared.
Conservative justices question scope of presidential immunity as Trump's legal team argues former presidents should be protected from prosecution for official acts.
A Quebec woman achieves justice through civil court after her abuser was acquitted in criminal court. This landmark case highlights alternative paths to justice for survivors of domestic violence.
Chinese court issues capital punishment for Myanmar nationals involved in brutal organized crime ring targeting Chinese citizens abroad. The landmark case highlights international cooperation against transnational criminal networks.
Pennsylvania's political landscape faces a major transformation as a Supreme Court vacancy sets up a high-stakes battle for control of the state's highest judicial body in 2025.
A Regina man makes his second court appearance for the alleged fatal highway shooting near Weyburn that claimed one life. Latest developments in the ongoing investigation.
The high-profile trial of Misha Pavelick reaches a pivotal moment as Crown prosecutors and defense lawyers prepare for closing arguments after witness testimony wraps up in Regina courtroom.
A group of Quebec medical students has launched a constitutional challenge against Bill 20, legislation that mandates family doctors maintain specific patient quotas or face financial penalties.
A controversial headstone bearing Hells Angels insignia must be removed from a Quebec cemetery following a court ruling, marking a significant move against biker gang symbolism in public spaces.
A major Canadian bank's technical glitch proves costly as BC court rules internal error prevents mortgage payout recovery in precedent-setting case.
A Fergus man faces serious charges after allegedly assaulting a police officer during an arrest. Learn about the incident that led to multiple criminal charges.
An Alberta court upholds union rights for Sobeys warehouse employees to protest at retail locations, escalating the ongoing labor dispute in Western Canada's grocery sector.
Explosive courtroom testimony reveals multiple knives were present during the chaotic night that led to Branton Custer Pavelick's death at Regina's LIQUID nightclub.
Canada's Immigration Minister Sean Fraser firmly dismisses employing the constitutional override to challenge a court decision striking down mandatory minimum sentences for child pornography offenses.
Freedom Convoy organizer Tamara Lich continues her legal fight as she appeals mischief and counseling mischief convictions. Get the latest on this high-profile case that captured national attention.
Medical students in Quebec are challenging the provincial government in court over Bill 2, arguing the new law creates unfair barriers to medical training and exacerbates the healthcare crisis.
A U.S. Border Patrol officer describes being struck by a sandwich with a pungent onion and mustard smell during chaotic January 6th Capitol riot testimony.
The Canadian government rules out invoking the controversial notwithstanding clause to restore mandatory minimum sentences for child pornography offenses, sparking debate over judicial discretion and child protection.
A Sudbury man previously on house arrest for violent offences is back in custody after police allege he breached his release conditions, raising concerns about public safety and judicial monitoring.
The U.S. Supreme Court is poised to decide the fate of presidential tariff authority in a landmark case that could reshape trade policy and challenge Trump-era economic tactics. Discover what's at stake for future administrations.
A British Columbia court case has resulted in a $10,000 fine against Amazon and established a crucial legal definition for delivery services that could impact e-commerce across Canada.
A shocking Supreme Court decision has sparked national outrage after ruling police violated a suspected child pornographer's rights. Legal experts warn this could jeopardize child protection efforts across Canada.
London court dismisses most claims in high-profile copyright infringement case, dealing blow to Getty Images while allowing trademark arguments to proceed.
University of Alberta law professor Steven Penney offers constitutional solution to preserve mandatory minimum sentences for child pornography offenses while avoiding controversial use of notwithstanding clause.
The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected former President Donald Trump's appeal in a landmark case challenging his administration's steel tariff policies, dealing a significant legal defeat with far-reaching implications for trade law and presidential power.
Postmedia's Kim Bolan receives the 2025 Webster Award for her outstanding legal journalism, recognized for her fearless coverage of complex court cases and commitment to truth-telling.