Royal Arrest Sparks Monarchy Debate Amid Political Pay Raise Controversy
Royal Arrest and Political Pay Raises Stir Public Debate

Royal Arrest and Political Pay Raises Ignite Public Debate

In a thought-provoking letter to the editor dated February 25, 2026, a reader from Calgary reflects on historical prophecies and contemporary political issues, stirring discussions on the monarchy, government salaries, and immigration policies.

King Farouk's Prophecy and the Windsor Dynasty

The letter opens with a reference to Egypt's King Farouk, who in 1948 predicted a global revolt that would leave only five kings: the King of England and the four kings of a standard deck of cards. This historical anecdote is used to frame the recent arrest of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, brother to King Charles, as a potential threat to the House of Windsor's reign. The writer notes that while this event may damage the royal family's standing, it is unlikely to end their rule entirely, expressing confidence that the card kings will continue to reign in casinos worldwide.

Critique of Political Pay Raises

Shifting focus to domestic affairs, the letter strongly criticizes recent pay raises for Members of Parliament and the Governor General. The author expresses disbelief at these increases, especially during a time when many Canadians face financial struggles. Questions are raised about the Governor General's value to the country, given the substantial salary and perks involved. The writer laments that only one MP refused the raise and expresses disappointment that Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre did not encourage his party members to follow suit, highlighting a perceived disconnect between politicians and the public.

Immigration Policy: Fast-Tracking and Deportation

The letter also addresses immigration, applauding Immigration Minister Lena Diab's announcement to fast-track immigrants for key professions. However, the author calls for a complementary policy to fast-track the deportation of illegal immigrants and others deemed undesirable, citing costs to healthcare, benefits, and fraud, as well as a lack of respect for Canadian laws and culture. The writer acknowledges this as a hopeful dream, suggesting skepticism about its implementation.

Public Sentiment and Political Realities

Throughout the letter, the tone is one of frustration and cynicism, with the author implying that politicians often prioritize their own interests over public welfare. The piece concludes with a resigned note, suggesting that while some policy changes may occur, others are unlikely, reflecting broader public discontent with current governance.