The conservative editorial board of The Wall Street Journal has launched a sharp critique against Donald Trump's administration, labeling it "The Gang That Couldn't Indict Straight" in a recent opinion piece that examines the legal setbacks facing the former president.
Legal Setbacks for Trump Administration
In a clever play on the 1971 comedy crime film "The Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight," the Journal's editorial board argued that Trump's "lawfare revenge tour has gone bust" following significant legal defeats. The criticism comes after a judge dismissed Justice Department cases against two high-profile targets: former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.
The newspaper, owned by media mogul Rupert Murdoch, detailed how the Trump administration's approach to legal matters suffered from procedural failures. "In its rush for retribution, the Trump Administration cut corners," the Journal spelled out in its analysis of the administration's legal strategy.
Procedural Failures and Consequences
The editorial emphasized the importance of following proper legal channels, noting that "This is what happens when officials don't follow legal procedure. They lose cases." This represents part of a broader pattern of criticism from the publication, which has increasingly challenged Trump on multiple issues since his return to the White House in January, including his handling of economic matters.
The relationship between Trump and the Murdoch-owned publication has shown signs of strain as the newspaper continues to scrutinize the administration's approach to governance and legal matters.
Broader Implications for Future Cases
The Journal's editorial concluded with a warning about the potential consequences of the administration's legal approach. "Trump was so eager to indict his enemies, and Attorney General Pam Bondi was so quick to go along, that it all unraveled at the pull of one legal thread," the piece stated.
The analysis suggested that further attempts to pursue similar legal actions could result in "cases that are two-time legal losers," indicating that the administration's current approach may face continued challenges in the judicial system without significant changes to legal strategy and procedural compliance.
