The New Democrats have expressed outrage over the federal government's consideration of alternative ownership models for airports, which could pave the way for privatization. NDP Leader Avi Lewis criticized the move, claiming it would harm the public, degrade quality, and hurt workers. However, Chris Selley argues that defending the current system is misguided, as Canadian airports are already overwhelmingly private-sector experiences from curb to gate.
The Reality of Airport Operations
From transportation to security to dining, airports rely on private contractors. Security officers are employed by private firms under CATSA, airlines are private, and retail and food services are run by companies like HMSHost, a subsidiary of Swiss giant Avolta. Even high-end dining at Toronto Pearson involves partnerships with private operators. Parking fees, taxi fares, and overpriced food are all private-sector costs borne by travelers.
Why Public Ownership?
Given that airports generate billions in profitable real estate, Selley questions why the government retains ownership. The opposition to change, he suggests, stems from a Canadian tendency to resist change and defend the status quo, even when it is mediocre. Privatization could unlock value for investments in long-term growth, rather than maintaining an inefficient system.
Critics like Lewis warn of higher costs and lower quality, but Selley counters that airports are already expensive and often subpar. The current model, he argues, is not a righteous cause worth defending.
