Trump Fights to Keep $5 Billion JPMorgan Lawsuit in Florida Court
Trump Fights to Keep JPMorgan Lawsuit in Florida Court

Trump Battles JPMorgan Over Venue for $5 Billion 'Debanking' Lawsuit

Former President Donald Trump is vigorously contesting JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s efforts to transfer his substantial $5 billion "debanking" lawsuit from Florida to New York. In recent court filings submitted on Monday in Miami, Trump's legal team asserted that the claims against JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon are not subject to the bank's standard customer agreements, which typically designate New York as the forum for disputes.

Allegations Against Jamie Dimon

Trump's lawsuit, originally filed in state court in Miami-Dade County, accuses Dimon of having "personally directed" the closure of Trump's accounts following the conclusion of his first presidential term in 2021. According to the complaint, this action was part of a broader campaign against conservatives whom Trump alleges have been wrongfully denied banking services.

"Dimon personally directed the unlawful debanking of the plaintiffs, as well as the creation and dissemination of a blacklist targeting President Trump, and circulated that blacklist to other financial institutions," stated Alejandro Brito, Trump's attorney, in the Monday filings. "At a minimum, those allegations establish far more than a reasonable possibility of liability under Florida law."

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Jurisdictional Dispute Intensifies

The legal battle centers on whether the case should be heard in Florida, where Trump claims the majority of the harm occurred, or in New York, as stipulated in JPMorgan's customer agreements. Trump's legal team argues that since Dimon is named as a defendant, the agreements do not apply, and the case should remain in Florida under the state's unfair trade practices law.

JPMorgan, however, contends that Dimon was improperly included in the lawsuit solely to avoid federal jurisdiction. Last month, the bank successfully moved the case to United States district court in Miami and has since sought to transfer it to federal court in Manhattan.

Broader Context of Account Closures

This lawsuit is part of a larger narrative involving financial institutions that severed ties with Trump and his businesses after the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Both JPMorgan and Capital One Financial Corp. closed accounts held by Trump, though neither bank has provided specific reasons for these actions.

"We do close accounts because they create legal or regulatory risk for the company," JPMorgan stated following the lawsuit's filing. "We regret having to do so but often rules and regulatory expectations lead us to do so."

Recent Legal Developments

In a related case, a federal judge in Miami recently dismissed the Trump Organization's lawsuit against Capital One, citing deficiencies and lack of detail. However, the judge allowed the company to file a new complaint by July, indicating ongoing legal challenges in this arena.

Trump's legal team is now pushing for the case to be returned to state court and has requested that this issue be resolved before any decision on JPMorgan's motion to transfer the case to New York. The outcome could set a significant precedent for how similar disputes between high-profile individuals and financial institutions are handled in the future.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration