Letters: Redundant government, civil liberties concerns, and leftist policies
Letters: Redundant government, civil liberties, leftist policies

A recent Alberta court decision quashing a citizen-led referendum petition because authorities failed to consult First Nations has sparked criticism. The ruling suggests that even basic democratic rights like signing a petition require multi-layered bureaucratic consultation. This comes as the federal government seeks to cut costs, leading some to question why redundant governments, consulting fees, travel, and the CBC are funded. Some suggest eliminating governments and handing control to courts and Indigenous leadership could save billions, though others worry about activist courts.

Who Will Be Left?

Reader Wayne Smith from Scarborough warns that left-leaning policies are wrecking Canada's foundation. He questions what will remain when nothing worthwhile is left, calling it a misguided movement. The response notes that Canadians keep voting for these parties, so policies continue.

Taking Liberties

Daniel Hunter from Williams Lake, B.C., expresses concern over proposed surveillance and identity verification laws like Bill C-22 and Bill S-209. He argues these are mass surveillance and tracking measures, not safety proposals, and are criticized by academics and rights organizations. He worries about a society demanding papers in everyday life and the erosion of human rights. The response acknowledges this could be a civil liberties nightmare.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration
Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list