In a series of letters to the editor published on February 13, 2026, readers express sharp criticism over government spending and political maneuvers, highlighting growing public discontent with taxpayer-funded initiatives.
Federal EV Subsidies Under Fire
One letter, titled "BAD DEAL," lambasts federal support for electric vehicles (EVs) as a wasteful expenditure. The author argues that Canadians, many struggling with high costs of living such as rent and basic food, are unfairly burdened with funding EVs for higher-income individuals. The critique extends to recent announcements by Mark Carney, which include additional taxpayer money for electric charging stations.
The letter suggests this move is politically motivated, possibly aimed at securing provincial conservative votes for the Liberal party in an upcoming federal election. It speculates on a potential quid pro quo involving Ontario auto industry support and a Quebec high-speed rail project, dubbed the "tunnel to nowhere." The author concludes that such policies are retreads of Liberal strategies designed to win urban votes, calling them purely political.
Toronto Budget Spending Controversy
Another letter, "NOT YOUR MONEY CHOW," targets Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow for using city funds to promote the 2026 budget and her re-election campaign. The author points out that Toronto homeowners have faced significant property tax increases in recent years, with rises of 9.5% in 2024 and 6.9% in 2025, leading to fatigue over higher taxes.
Criticism centers on Chow's allocation of $142,000 in city money for budget promotion, which the letter describes as fiscally irresponsible and a prioritization of political ambitions over taxpayer interests. The author also references Chow's support for spending $12.7 million to rename Yonge-Dundas Square to Sankofa Square, implying further mismanagement of public funds.
Broader Political Frustrations
A third letter, "CLOSED FOR BUSINESS," shifts focus to international politics, calling for action against former U.S. President Donald Trump over alleged abuses of authority. The author suggests global economic sanctions, such as countries ceasing business with the U.S. until Trump leaves office, though it notes that current trends show increased investment in the U.S., contradicting this proposal.
These letters collectively reflect a climate of skepticism and anger toward government spending and political actions, with readers demanding greater accountability and prudent use of taxpayer money in both federal and municipal contexts.
