A significant debate is underway regarding the selection of Canada's next-generation fighter aircraft, with a compelling case being made for the Swedish Saab Gripen E over the American F-35.
Technical Capabilities: A Head-to-Head Comparison
When comparing the two aircraft on pure performance metrics, each jet demonstrates distinct advantages. The Lockheed Martin F-35 proves superior in several key areas, including its operational range, advanced stealth capabilities, sustained turn rate, overall armament load, and its sophisticated ability to network with other military assets.
Conversely, the Saab Gripen E holds its own with notable strengths. It achieves a higher top speed, boasts a superior instantaneous turn rate and agility, and features advanced electronic warfare and jamming systems. From a practical and fiscal standpoint, the Gripen E also presents a lower capital cost and significantly lower operating cost.
Strategic Advantages for Canada
The benefits of selecting the Gripen E extend beyond technical specifications. The aircraft offers easier and faster maintenance routines, better parts availability, and most importantly for a northern nation like Canada, superior Arctic capability. This makes it exceptionally well-suited for sovereignty patrols and operations in Canada's far north.
Choosing the Swedish fighter would also strengthen Canada's industrial and technological base. The decision promises the creation of many thousands of good jobs and includes significant potential for technology transfer and development within Canada. This partnership would also foster a heightened, mutually beneficial relationship with Sweden, a valuable allied nation.
The Verdict for Canadians
When all factors are weighed—including bolstering national sovereignty, economic benefits, and operational suitability for Canada's unique geography—the analysis points to a clear conclusion. For Canadians seeking a cost-effective, highly capable, and strategically advantageous fighter jet, the Saab Gripen E emerges as the definitive choice.
The opinion was articulated by Mike Priaro of Calgary in a published letter on November 24, 2025.
