CRA Denies Taxpayer Relief for Late Filing: Court Upholds Decision
CRA Denies Late Filing Relief: Court Upholds Decision

The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has denied a taxpayer's request for relief from late-filing penalties and interest, a decision upheld by the Federal Court. This case serves as a cautionary tale for those who file their taxes late, even with seemingly valid reasons.

Late-Filing Penalties and Interest

Filing your 2025 tax return late can result in a penalty of five percent of the balance owing, plus an additional one percent for each month the return is late, up to a maximum of 12 months. For self-employed individuals and their spouses, the deadline is June 15, 2025. If you have been assessed a late-filing penalty in any of the previous three years, these penalties double to 10 percent of the unpaid amount, plus two percent per late month, up to a maximum of 20 months. Additionally, non-deductible arrears interest, compounded daily at the current prescribed rate of seven percent, can accumulate quickly.

Requesting Taxpayer Relief

Taxpayers who face penalties and interest can request the CRA to waive or cancel them under the taxpayer relief provisions. If the CRA denies the request, the taxpayer can seek a judicial review in Federal Court to determine if the CRA officer's decision was reasonable. This process was recently tested in a Halifax courtroom.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

The Case

The taxpayer, a specialized technician in the Canadian film and television industry, sought relief from late-filing penalties and interest for the 2020 and 2021 taxation years. He cited financial, familial, and medical issues during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the inability to reach his long-time accountant after relocating from Western Canada with an infant, the need for extensive home repairs, and periodic debilitating pain. The film and television industry also experienced significant declines during the pandemic and in 2023.

The first CRA officer expressed sympathy but denied relief. A second review by a different officer also denied the request, noting that the taxpayer's household income and Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA) were sufficient to pay the balance without causing financial hardship. The officer pointed out that the taxpayer continued to make annual TFSA contributions while interest on his tax debt accrued and found no direct connection between his non-compliance and the circumstances he presented.

Judicial Review

The taxpayer challenged the CRA's decision in Federal Court, arguing that the agency failed to consider his evidence in its totality, relied on irrelevant considerations, and did not apply its own policy. However, the court dismissed the application, emphasizing that its role is not to reweigh the evidence but to assess the reasonableness of the CRA officer's decision. The court found the decision to be reasonable and upheld the denial of relief.

This case underscores the importance of timely tax filing and the challenges of obtaining relief even under difficult circumstances.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration