Ottawa Court Delays Reach Crisis Point: Lawyer
Ottawa's justice system faces a crisis as judicial delays force majority of criminal cases to be stayed or withdrawn, violating accused rights under Jordan ruling.
Ottawa's justice system faces a crisis as judicial delays force majority of criminal cases to be stayed or withdrawn, violating accused rights under Jordan ruling.
Canada's Supreme Court eliminated mandatory minimum sentences for child pornography, prompting conservative calls for the notwithstanding clause and sparking debate about judicial overreach.
The disciplinary hearing for a Guelph police officer continues as cross-examination of a forensic psychiatrist proceeds. Stay updated on this developing story.
A Houthi court in Yemen has handed down death sentences to 17 individuals convicted of espionage. Learn about the details and international implications of this controversial ruling.
U.S. Supreme Court halts lower court ruling that found Texas congressional map likely racially biased. Latest development in ongoing voting rights battle.
Missouri Circuit Judge Matthew Thornhill agrees to resign after wearing Elvis Presley wig and playing music in court. Read about the judicial misconduct case.
A judicial recount has reaffirmed the Progressive Conservative majority in Newfoundland and Labrador, solidifying the election results. Discover the details and implications for the province's future.
Final judicial recounts in the Montreal municipal election have confirmed the victories of Dominic Perri, Mauro Barone, and Gemma Marchione in St-Léonard. All 10 requested recounts across the city maintained the original outcomes.
Conservative MP Jamil Jivani sparks debate by calling the National School Food Program government overreach, arguing for economic solutions instead. Read the full analysis.
Saskatchewan judge voids murder convictions in James 'Ed' Swift's execution-style killing, citing unreliable witness testimony clouded by drugs and alcohol. Read the full judicial analysis.
Court proceedings begin to examine proposed Alberta separation referendum question. Legal experts scrutinize wording as province considers historic vote on independence from Canada.
The family of Eric Omeasoo, a 13-year-old fatally stabbed at an Edmonton LRT station, is seeking a judicial review after police and Crown prosecutors declined to charge the killer, citing self-defence. Learn about the case details.
Federal judge criticizes Justice Department's handling of James Comey investigation, citing serious procedural errors. Read the latest developments in this ongoing legal battle.
Judicial recount continues in Côte-Saint-Luc mayoral race where David Tordjman leads incumbent Mitchell Brownstein by just one vote. Follow the dramatic election outcome.
A judge has mandated a recount in a Newfoundland and Labrador electoral district following last month's provincial election, adding a new chapter to the closely watched race. Learn the details.
A Kitchener justice of the peace pleaded not guilty today following an alleged altercation with another JP. The case highlights internal courthouse tensions.
Federal judges across the U.S. are issuing strongly worded rulings against Trump administration policies, defending constitutional principles and judicial independence in unprecedented times.
Nova Scotia's top judge defends courtroom poppy ban decision as Veterans Affairs minister respects court independence. Latest developments in Remembrance Day controversy.
Nova Scotia's top judges defend banning poppies in courtrooms, citing impartiality. Veterans and legal experts call it a betrayal of Canadian sacrifices ahead of Remembrance Day.
Projet Montréal challenges four Montreal election results, including Lachine mayor lost by 26 votes. Judicial recounts requested amid concerns over electoral process.
Nova Scotia's top judges defend the decision to ban staff from wearing poppies in courtrooms, emphasizing judicial neutrality. Premier Tim Houston calls the move 'disgusting.'
A controversial British Columbia court decision granting the Cowichan Tribes ownership of a former RV park has legal experts and property owners questioning the future of private property rights in Canada. This landmark ruling could set a precedent for In
Donald Trump issues stark warning about potential Supreme Court decision on presidential tariff powers, claiming it would have catastrophic consequences for American trade and national security.
A critical examination of judicial activism in Canada reveals how courts may be undermining democratic processes through expansive Charter interpretations, raising concerns about parliamentary sovereignty.
A French court postpones the trial of suspects linked to the infamous Louvre Museum theft, citing excessive media attention that could compromise judicial fairness.
Pennsylvania's political landscape faces a major transformation as a Supreme Court vacancy sets up a high-stakes battle for control of the state's highest judicial body in 2025.
An examination of Canada's persistent paternalistic governance culture that transcends political leadership and threatens economic freedom.
A Windsor judge has denied bail to a local 'Creeper Hunter' while maintaining a publication ban on the specific reasons behind the decision, leaving the public in suspense about the case details.
The U.S. Supreme Court is poised to decide the fate of presidential tariff authority in a landmark case that could reshape trade policy and challenge Trump-era economic tactics. Discover what's at stake for future administrations.
A Windsor man previously charged in connection with a shooting on Via Italia is back in custody after allegedly violating his bail conditions, raising concerns about public safety and the judicial process.