Judge scolds prosecutors in Comey leaks case
A U.S. district judge delivers sharp criticism to federal prosecutors while ordering disclosure of records from investigation into former FBI Director James Comey's memo handling.
A U.S. district judge delivers sharp criticism to federal prosecutors while ordering disclosure of records from investigation into former FBI Director James Comey's memo handling.
A crucial witness in a Saskatoon murder trial faces credibility challenges after admitting to being heavily medicated during court testimony, raising questions about the case's integrity.
The controversial host behind Creeper Hunter TV is self-representing against fresh criminal charges in London, Ontario, as his online vigilantism continues to spark legal battles.
Conservative justices question scope of presidential immunity as Trump's legal team argues former presidents should be protected from prosecution for official acts.
The high-profile trial of Richard Mantha, accused of multiple sexual assaults in Calgary, has been postponed indefinitely due to concerning health complications facing the 59-year-old defendant.
A Quebec woman achieves justice through civil court after her abuser was acquitted in criminal court. This landmark case highlights alternative paths to justice for survivors of domestic violence.
A federal judge delivers a stunning rebuke to prosecutors handling the James Comey leaks case, ordering immediate production of all investigation records and questioning government transparency.
Pennsylvania's political landscape faces a major transformation as a Supreme Court vacancy sets up a high-stakes battle for control of the state's highest judicial body in 2025.
A Regina man makes his second court appearance for the alleged fatal highway shooting near Weyburn that claimed one life. Latest developments in the ongoing investigation.
The high-profile trial of Misha Pavelick reaches a pivotal moment as Crown prosecutors and defense lawyers prepare for closing arguments after witness testimony wraps up in Regina courtroom.
A shocking Supreme Court decision has sparked national outrage after ruling police violated a suspected child pornographer's rights. Legal experts warn this could jeopardize child protection efforts across Canada.
The Justice Department urges judge to reject James Comey's dismissal bid in Trump's classified documents case, arguing presidential immunity extends to social media posts.
Nova Scotia's Justice Minister Brad Johns condemns Supreme Court decision eliminating mandatory minimum sentences for child pornography possession, calling it 'deeply concerning' for victims.
Recent Calgary court proceedings resulted in significant sentences for crimes including fentanyl trafficking, aggravated assault, and fraud. Get the latest on who was sentenced and for what offenses.
A Nova Scotia man accused in a violent hospital stabbing incident has chosen a judge and jury trial. Get the latest courtroom developments and what's next in this high-profile Halifax case.
A Georgia man who spent 43 years in prison before his murder conviction was overturned now fights deportation after a federal court temporarily blocked ICE from removing him from the country.
A shocking attempted murder case in British Columbia sees justice upheld as the BC Court of Appeal rejects the shooter's conviction challenge. Discover the dramatic courtroom details and legal implications.
A Saskatchewan family reveals shocking courtroom protocols during a murder trial, including being told to flip shirts inside out to avoid influencing the jury in Saskatoon.
A controversial Supreme Court decision sparks outrage as legal experts warn it could weaken Canada's child protection laws. Discover why this ruling has become a national flashpoint.
Alberta and Saskatchewan premiers are pushing the federal government to use the notwithstanding clause to reinstate mandatory minimum sentences for child pornography offences after Supreme Court ruling.
Nova Scotia's justice minister declares the province will intervene as opposing party in landmark case challenging mandatory minimum sentences for child pornography possession.
A landmark US Supreme Court decision on tariff enforcement could have ripple effects across the Canadian border, potentially impacting trade relationships and consumer prices.
A controversial Supreme Court decision declaring mandatory minimum sentences for child pornography unconstitutional has ignited firestorm across Canada, raising serious questions about judicial accountability.
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre pledges to invoke the Constitution's notwithstanding clause to reverse a controversial Supreme Court decision striking down mandatory minimum sentences for child pornography offences.
The controversial creator of the vigilante show 'Creeper Hunter' faces another delay in his bail proceedings as new evidence emerges in the London, Ontario case.
An Ontario provincial police officer faces disciplinary action after appearing pantless during a virtual court proceeding, raising questions about professional conduct in the digital age.
Former FBI Director James Comey files motion to dismiss charges against him, arguing legal ambiguity and procedural errors undermine the case. Get the latest on this high-profile legal battle.
A Winnipeg teenager has been sentenced to life in prison for the horrific beating deaths of three individuals in 2022. The shocking case has left Manitoba's legal system and community grappling with youth violence.
In a dramatic turn, prosecutors have dropped a controversial jailhouse informant from testifying in the Andrew Rosenfeldt murder case, raising questions about witness credibility and trial strategy.
The City of Barrie launches an innovative automated reminder system for outstanding court fines, making it easier for residents to stay compliant and avoid additional penalties.