The London Police Services Board is standing by its recent decision to appoint its former chair, Ali Chahbar, to a senior legal role within the police service, stating the hiring process was transparent and above board.
Board Addresses Perceptions of Favoritism
In a move that has drawn public scrutiny, the board hired Chahbar to serve as general counsel to the police chief. The appointment raised questions due to Chahbar's recent position as chair of the very board that approved his hiring. Board officials, however, have firmly rejected any notion of an "inside baseball" deal, emphasizing that the recruitment followed proper procedures.
Ali Chahbar, who also serves as a solicitor for the Thames Valley District School Board (TVDSB), brings significant legal experience to the position. The board argues his expertise makes him uniquely qualified for the role, which involves providing high-level legal advice directly to the chief of police.
Timing and Transparency of the Hire
The decision was finalized and announced on December 19, 2025. In defending the choice, board members highlighted the rigorous steps taken during the hiring process. They contend that focusing on Chahbar's immediate past role as chair overlooks his long-standing career in law and public service.
The board's public statement aimed to preempt concerns about conflicts of interest, insisting that all ethical guidelines were strictly followed. The message was clear: the selection was based on merit and the specific needs of the police service's legal department, not on personal connections.
Implications for Public Trust and Next Steps
This hiring occurs at a time when public trust in institutions is a paramount concern. The London Police Services Board's vigorous defense underscores its attempt to maintain transparency and accountability. The board likely hopes that by addressing the concerns head-on, it can reassure the community about the integrity of its operational decisions.
Moving forward, Chahbar's performance in the new role will be closely watched. His deep understanding of both the board's governance and the legal landscape is seen as an asset, but the onus is on the board and the police service to demonstrate that this appointment serves the public interest effectively and without bias.
