An Egyptian court has definitively upheld a five-year prison sentence for a prominent economist, rejecting a final appeal in a case that has drawn international scrutiny. The ruling, delivered on December 25, 2025, solidifies a conviction that critics argue is politically motivated.
Final Verdict Delivered
The appellate court's decision marks the end of the legal road for the economist, whose identity was confirmed in the original report from the AFP news service. The initial conviction and sentencing occurred prior to this latest judicial action, with the appeal representing the last chance to overturn the verdict.
While the specific charges were not detailed in the initial bulletin, such cases in Egypt often involve accusations like "spreading false news" or "misusing social media," charges frequently levied against dissenting voices, including academics, journalists, and activists.
Context of the Ruling
The ruling occurs under the government of President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, who has led the country since 2014. His administration has been consistently criticized by international human rights organizations for a widespread crackdown on political opposition, civil society, and intellectual freedom.
The judiciary, once viewed as relatively independent, is now widely seen by watchdog groups as an instrument of state policy, used to silence criticism and consolidate power. The upholding of this sentence against a respected economist fits a established pattern of targeting professionals and thinkers.
International Reaction and Implications
Although the immediate news report did not include international commentary, similar verdicts have historically prompted condemnation from Western governments, United Nations bodies, and human rights groups. They argue such actions stifle essential debate and damage Egypt's economic and social development by persecuting its experts.
For the economist, the confirmed sentence means years of imprisonment. For Egypt's civil society and academic community, the message is one of continued intimidation. The case underscores the challenging environment for independent thought and economic analysis within the nation, potentially affecting both domestic policy and foreign investment perceptions.
The final appeal decision, announced on Christmas Day, closes this legal chapter but is likely to renew debates about Egypt's human rights record and the space for legitimate critique under President el-Sisi's rule.
