A practitioner offering 'vaginal rejuvenation' services in British Columbia has been released on bail as he appeals his convictions for sexual assault. The case, which has drawn significant attention, involves serious allegations against a figure in the unregulated cosmetic treatment industry.
The Convictions and Bail Decision
Farshad Khojsteh Kashani was found guilty of sexual assault charges related to his work. Following his conviction, his legal team filed an appeal. A judge has now ruled that Kashani can be released on bail while the appeal process unfolds. This decision means he will not remain in custody as his lawyers challenge the verdicts in a higher court.
The bail conditions are expected to be strict, though specific details of the release order were not immediately disclosed in the initial report. The decision to grant bail during an appeal is not automatic and requires judicial consideration of factors like flight risk and public safety.
The Practitioner and His Business
Kashani operated under the business name Fab Skin Care. His website, which previously promoted services including so-called 'vaginal rejuvenation,' became unavailable after the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) announced the charges against him. A cached version of the site featured his photo and details of his practice.
'Vaginal rejuvenation' is a broad term for cosmetic procedures aimed at the vaginal area. These treatments are often marketed for aesthetic or functional concerns but exist in a regulatory grey zone, with many procedures not being recognized as medically necessary or standardized.
Context and Broader Implications
This case highlights ongoing concerns about the regulation of cosmetic medical procedures in Canada, particularly those performed outside of traditional medical settings by non-physicians. The convictions and subsequent appeal raise critical questions about patient safety, informed consent, and the oversight of such practices.
The legal process continues as the appeal moves forward. The outcome of the appeal will determine whether the original convictions stand or are overturned. The case serves as a stark reminder for consumers to exercise extreme caution and conduct thorough research when considering any cosmetic or medical treatment from a private clinic.
The original report on this development was published on December 17, 2025. The story continues to develop as the judicial appeal process proceeds.
