Trump Contemplates Cabinet Overhaul Amid Iran War Backlash
WASHINGTON, April 4 (Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump is actively weighing a significant cabinet shake-up following the recent removal of Attorney General Pam Bondi, as he grapples with mounting frustration over the political repercussions of the ongoing war with Iran. According to five sources familiar with internal White House discussions, this potential reshuffling could serve as a strategic reset for the administration during a politically turbulent period.
Political Fallout and Approval Ratings
The five-week-old conflict has triggered a cascade of challenges, including rising gas prices, a decline in Trump's approval ratings, and heightened anxiety among Republicans as the midterm elections approach in November. Some allies have criticized the president's televised address to the nation on Wednesday, which was intended to project control and confidence but reportedly fell flat, amplifying calls for changes in messaging or personnel.
"A shake-up to show action is not a bad thing, is it?" remarked one White House official, highlighting the internal pressure for a response to the crisis.
Potential Targets for Removal
Three White House officials and two additional sources, speaking anonymously due to the sensitivity of the matter, indicated that while no single cabinet member is guaranteed to lose their job imminently, several are at risk. Specifically, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick are among those potentially on the chopping block, following recent dismissals of Bondi and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
Trump has expressed displeasure with Gabbard in recent months, and sources note he has inquired about potential replacements for the intelligence chief. Meanwhile, high-profile allies are privately advocating for Lutnick's removal, citing renewed scrutiny over his past association with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Lutnick has defended himself, stating he had minimal interaction with Epstein.
White House Statements and Confidence
White House spokesman Davis Ingle asserted that Trump maintains "total confidence" in both Gabbard and Lutnick, praising their contributions to the administration's achievements. In an email, Ingle highlighted Gabbard's role in addressing international threats and Lutnick's success in securing trade deals. Additionally, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence referenced a White House social media post reaffirming this confidence.
Internal Debates and Strategic Considerations
Despite the speculation, Trump may ultimately decide against major changes, as some close advisors caution against frequent overhauls that could create an impression of chaos. One official described the potential approach as a "targeted churn" rather than a dramatic reset. However, following the underwhelming national address, inaction could pose political risks comparable to making significant personnel changes.
The president's speech, crafted with his team, failed to outline an exit strategy for the war that began on February 28, leaving it perceived as open-ended. Instead of addressing economic concerns, Trump attributed the hardships to Tehran, which did not resonate well with voters facing immediate financial strain.
Public Opinion and Media Frustration
Recent polls reflect the administration's challenges, with only 36% of Americans approving of Trump's job performance—the lowest of his current term—and 60% disapproving of the decision to engage in the Iran war. Trump has expressed frustration with media coverage, demanding more positive accounts, though he has not indicated plans to adjust his own messaging strategy.
Despite negative headlines, some cabinet members have shown resilience. For instance, Lutnick faced criticism last year for controversial tariffs, while Gabbard upset the White House with her critiques of military interventions. Nonetheless, sources suggest the likelihood of a shake-up has increased in recent weeks, with one senior official hinting that more changes are imminent.
"Let's just say, based on what I have heard, Bondi is not the last one," another White House official concluded, signaling ongoing uncertainty within the administration.
