The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal heard arguments on Monday in a defamation case involving a University of Regina professor and the author of a book about the so-called 'Starlight Tours.' The case stems from the professor's online comment describing the book as 'racist garbage.'
Background of the Case
The dispute began when the professor, whose identity has not been disclosed, posted a critical review of the book on social media. The author subsequently filed a defamation lawsuit, claiming the remark damaged their reputation and harmed book sales. The trial court initially ruled in favor of the author, awarding damages. The professor appealed that decision.
Arguments Before the Court
During the hearing, the professor's legal team argued that the comment was a protected opinion under free speech provisions, not a statement of fact. They contended that calling a book 'racist garbage' is subjective criticism, not defamatory. The author's lawyers countered that the remark was malicious and intended to discredit the work, causing tangible harm.
The three-judge panel questioned both sides closely, probing the boundary between opinion and defamation in the context of academic discourse. A decision is expected in the coming weeks.
Broader Implications
This case has drawn attention from free speech advocates and academic circles, who fear a ruling against the professor could chill critical commentary on controversial topics. The 'Starlight Tours' refer to a dark chapter in Saskatchewan's history when Indigenous people were allegedly driven out of Saskatoon and left to die in freezing conditions.
