The College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia is seeking a court order to permanently close a Vancouver cancer clinic that allegedly employs unregistered individuals posing as doctors. The clinic, Rolland Cancer Options Treatment and Management, along with its owner Alexander Rolland and eight others, is accused of offering unauthorized cancer tests, treatments, and medications.
Allegations of Misconduct
According to a petition filed in B.C. Supreme Court, the college alleges that clinic employees instructed patients to deceive their oncologists if they disagreed with the recommended treatments. The petition claims that Rolland and co-founder Michelle Morand told clients their doctors were less informed and provided false information.
The clinic reportedly hosted group chats on YouTube, encouraging patients to share full medical details. In one instance, Rolland told a woman with early-stage non-invasive breast cancer that it was not a serious concern and would not spread, downplaying the condition.
Unlicensed Practices
The petition alleges that employees conducted molecular testing and biopsies without proper accreditation. They used the title "doctor," which is legally reserved for college registrants, and engaged in diagnosing, treating, and advising patients. The staff managed conditions, designed therapeutic diets, ordered lab tests, and interpreted results.
Named in the petition are Noushin Moshgabadi, Saima Paracha, Alaknanda Dhotre, George Kapiyo, Maryem Hamid Khan, Tahereh Kashkoulinejad Kouhi, and Moemen Abdalla, who held titles such as cancer research scientist or specialist. None are registered medical doctors.
Clinic Operations
The company is incorporated in B.C. and based in Halfmoon Bay, with its clinic located at the Sinclair Centre in downtown Vancouver. The clinic's website claimed to offer second opinions and advanced cancer care, inviting clients to "access the most advanced cancer care in the world."
The college is pursuing a permanent injunction to stop these practices, citing public safety concerns. The case highlights the risks of unregulated medical services and the importance of regulatory oversight in healthcare.
